Hold on… I think that’s a little over the line.
Microsoft isn’t any more “criminal” than Apple in my books. Let me know when Apple decides to let other companies play protected AAC files with their software/hardware.That didn’t appear to be about slamming or rhetoric, it’s about facts. Microsoft is a convicted, criminal company. Dragged to court. Lost. They pay fines to settle. Not just greivances about patents or trademarks, but illegal activities, too. US. Europe. Elsewhere.
That’s a big difference between playing hard-nosed business and actually breaking the law and being convicted.
I was probably away and didn’t get involved in this one, though I have a distinct opinion. I’ve used Microsoft products from time to time as a business necessity, but the fact still remains that they are a criminal company; tried and convicted, and tried again.
More interesting, though, is Bill Gates’ propensity for disclosing his vision of the future and then missing it entirely. In that one area both Gates and Apple’s Steve Jobs differ dramatically.
In another area we see some semblance of convergence; the living room. Gates is tackling the future of the living room on two fronts that are connected; games and media center.
Jobs and Apple appear to be approaching the living room with the Mac as a ‘hub’ (vs. Windows and/or XBox360 as a hub) to manage all the digital spokes; music, movies, photos, et al. Apple is still missing the TV and purchased movies spoke (as is Windows), so that will probably evolve over the next year or so.
Also interesting is Intel’s new chips with the ability to partition and run multiple OS’s at the same time, and Apple’s application for a patent to nail down that capability.
I see more battles brewing between the two. This time Microsoft has to compete on a level, legal playing field, where they haven’t had as much success.

