|
Mac360 Power Search
Click below for advanced search options »
Mac360 Archives
By Month, All, Category
|
How To Share iCal Calendars On Macs And Google.
Everything about Apple’s products sings the praises of integrate this, synchronize that, make it drop-dead easy, Mac or Windows. Apple provides easy integration between iTunes and iMovie and iPhoto and iWeb and Garageband in iLife. There’s easy integration between iPhoto and Mail, and Mail and AddressBook. As to synchronization, who does it better for the average music lover? All that’s required to sync an iPod to a Mac or Windows PC is to plug it in. The battery gets recharged, playlists are updated, new music, videos, TV shows, movies all get synchronized between computer and player. Apple carries the integration and synchronization a step beyond the computer and connects it to a .Mac account. $99 a year lets you store files, upload photos, and sync important files like Safari bookmarks and keychain information between Macs. Even Apple’s iPhone gets the easy sync and integrate routine. Plug it in, the iPhone gets updated with new applications and data gets synced. Apple even promises integration and synchronization between the iPhone and Microsoft Exchange in a future version.
Synchronize and integrate. Except for iCal. That’s where BusySync comes in. BusySync is a nifty Mac utility which lets users share iCal calendars with coworkers or family members on a local area network at the office, or your home network. Mac users love iCal. It’s simple, straightforward interface makes it easy to use, and easy to publish if you have a .Mac account, but not if you don’t, and most Mac users don’t. So, how can you publish a calendar for all to see and make it easy to update? BusySync does two things very well. First, it publishes your iCal calendar on your network. When you make an update, the changes are reflected everywhere-- to other users who have access to your iCal calendar. Second, BusySync synchronizes your iCal calendar with Google Calendar. Make a change on one, and it gets updated on the other. You can make changes to iCal on your Mac when you’re not online, and BusySync will sync up once you’re back online. View and change your Google Calendar and your Mac will sync up to the changes. Sync between home and work. Sync between Macs. Wait. There’s more. BusySync allows for multi-user editing. Share and edit calendars between users. Changes made by each user are synced with all others on the network. That’s perfect for a busy office environment.
Calendars are password protected by user and by group. Any changes you make to your calendar offline, while you’re traveling, for example, get updated as soon as you connect again. For home and office users, BusySync uses Apple’s Bonjour networking to find users to connect, so there’s no need for a complicated and expensive back end server such as Microsoft Exchange Server. If synchronization and integration are all the rage, then Apple still has a few regions to conquer, including iCal and Mail. For example, the upcoming release of Apple’s iPhone 2.0 software will integrate and sync with Exchange, but not with your Mac’s Mail. Still, for calendar users who need flexibility and low price, BusySync is a handy way to stay in touch and stay connected, online, offline, Mac to Mac. Where else would you like to see Apple add synchronization and integration? Mail? Calendar? AddressBook? Google and Yahoo? Share your frustration and experience in the Mac360 Comments section below. Check out the daily list of our 9 Word mini-Reviews at NoodleMac, and Kate's daily in-depth Mac software reviews at PixoBebo. Off Topic #23 - Mac OS X Leopard is now at version 10.5.2 which we’re proclaiming the best yet, though we expect version 10.5.3 soon. If you haven’t upgraded yet, don’t forget that Leopard is on sale at the Mac360 Store, and so are the latest Leopard books. If you plan to order Leopard or a Leopard tips book from Amazon, please consider using the Mac360 Store to place your order (it’s really Amazon). Click Here to look at the latest Leopard books. Off Topic #58 - Do politicians use personal computers? Of course. We’ve heard Barack Obama prefers a Mac, while Hillary Clinton uses a Dell, though, apparently neither of the candidates can bowl. Does Obama’s potential vice president use a Mac? Even Clinton acknowledges Apple’s brand power but says she can’t afford a Mac. Maybe she’d win if she used a Mac.
• Article by Kate MacKenzie • Published on Tuesday, March 11, 2008
• Category: Reviews • 5 Reader comment(s) • Email This • Digg This • Shop Now
« Previously Finally, CSS Editing Made Easy By MacRabbit.
Nextly » A Few Things Apple Has Learned About Customers.
Talk Back to Kate, Ron & the Mac360 staff Maestree Comercio says:
Working wonderful on Tiger Server, Thanks for the tip! — Posted on Mon Apr 07 at 2:24 pm by Maestree Comercio
Willis says:
Anyone who believes that there are more Exchange users than cell phone users or Mac users doesn’t understand the numbers. Exchange is popular but not ubiquitous. Cell phones are ubiquitous. iCal is great and it’s free. It comes with every Mac. It does a good job of integrating calendar information-- as far as it goes, which is probably far enough for ‘most’ Mac users. Exchange is ‘a’ business standard and Apple is wise to provide connectivity to Exchange now, rather than later. That helps speed adoption. In a couple of years Apple is likely to have as many iPhone customers as Mac users, then let the real integration begin. Think of the value of an iPhone that integrates superbly with a Mac’s applications. Microsoft won’t die any time soon, but they’re bleeding badly. — Posted on Tue Mar 11 at 4:34 pm by Willis
Mark says:
Homeboy,
If you need to mesh with an exchange server through work, like many Mac users do, then you either have to go with Entourage or fork over more money for something like Groupcal. This issue goes beyond my initial complaints. If you think the iPhone is popular now, wait until there is tight integration with Exchange. Apple needs to face the fact that MS got to the party first, and that the business world is not going to let go of it. It would be better for Apple to figure out how to integrate while providing the Mac interface we love rather than ignore the reality in front of them. Ironically, iCal and Entourage really aren’t that different. Entourage uses one calendar with many categories that are color-coded and iCal uses many different calendars that are color coded. I just don’t see the advantage of having multiple calendars...did that many people carry around multiple day-timers before electronic organization caught on? — Posted on Tue Mar 11 at 4:03 pm by Mark
homeboy user says:
I love the multiple calendars in iCal. Simple. Easy to understand. Free. Microsoft Entourage. Complex. Difficult to understand. Expensive. Case closed. — Posted on Tue Mar 11 at 3:00 pm by homeboy user
Mark says:
Sorry, but I for one am one of the Mac users who hates the iCal multiple calendar idea. To me, this is one element that Entourage gets right: let the user assign different categories for each task or appointment, and then show them all on one calendar so I can see my whole day, week, or month quickly. The multiple calendar format is terrible for syncing with Entourage (granted MS could do their part to help here) or other apps like OmniFocus. — Posted on Tue Mar 11 at 2:50 pm by Mark
∧ Back To Top |
What's in the FORUMS?
Newest Daily Topics
Also in Mac360
Recent Articles
|
| Copyright © 2004 - 2008 PanGeo Media, Honolulu, Hawaii USA. All Rights Reserved.
Mac360 is published and edited by Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI USA. Mac360 is served on an Apple Xserve using Mac OS X Tiger Server. Powered by ExpressionEngine at ServerLogistics. |