In an enlightened world is there such a thing as too much free speech? Take Linux founder Linus Torvalds. Please.
His latest point of view is that parts of Mac OS X are ‘utter crap.’ Guess what? He doesn’t like Windows Vista, either. Surprised?
I suppose we could toss aside Torvalds recent remarks as ‘his opinion’ and recognize that he’s the head of the Linux religion, which isn’t making much headway on the desktop against the heathen Windows and enlightened Mac OS X.
Having been a very long time Mac user, a Windows user, and a Linux user, along with various flavors of Unix here and there, I’m willing to defend Torvalds’ position against the entrenched opposition.
Without getting into the nuts and bolts of one kernel vs. another kernel, or Open Source vs. commercial, Torvalds, I would argue, is a non-pragmatic purist in an impure world where pragmatists live and prosper. That includes both Windows and Mac OS X, both of which have prospered mightily.
What of Linux? As a server operating system, Linux appears to do quite well in terms of market share, even mindshare, but simply doesn’t prosper in the rest of the computing world—the desktop.
The varied Linux desktops and application suites as computing environments attached to the operating system, admittedly not Torvalds’s domain or responsibility, are pretty much a joke compared to the vast richness available on Windows and Mac OS X.
But Torvalds may be right from his perspective. After all, he said, “I don’t think they’re equally flawed - I think Leopard is a much better system.”
Then he called Leopard’s file system ‘utter crap.’ Maybe so, maybe not. Let me not argue the fine points of file systems as they’re a dynamic anyway, and it appears that Apple is moving toward the highly touted ZFS file system, and besides, does it matter? To a purist who wants the world to see everything his way, perhaps. For the rest of us? Not so much.
Without really understanding exactly what he stumbled upon, Torvalds identified the real banana behind the skin. His view is that Linux is a real operating system, and Leopard and Vista are not. They’re environments. I agree. Here’s what he said:
“An operating system should be completely invisible… To Microsoft and Apple (it is) a way to control the whole environment… to force people to upgrade their applications and hardware.”
At a very basic level, he’s probably correct. Windows Vista and Mac OS X are really computing ‘environments’ more than they are mere operating systems, as Torvalds purports Linux to be.
Only the very geekiest among computer users look forward to an upgrade of the Linux kernel, while Mac users by the millions throng to Apple’s synagogues to tithe and worship, purchase and upgrade.
Torvalds, the OS religious purist, will have none of that crass commercialism. We should thank God that Torvalds toils away on Linux and not on OS X. Microsoft and Apple actually have customers who pay money for products and service and have expectations that go beyond a free lunch, beyond a mere OS.
Torvalds’ success in the business world simply doesn’t match what cash-paying customers require. Glitz, glitter, shine, leather seats, climate controlled GUI, sometimes questionable functionality blended with infinite and sexy chic.
Yes, Linux may well be a better operating system than what is hidden in Windows Vista or Mac OS X, but it doesn’t matter. Linux is a very poor desktop solution, a weak computing environment to handle the personal computing requirements of the great unwashed masses of the developed world.
I say, let him have his purity, his hand crafted kernel updates, his anemic selection of Fisher-Price GUIs, and his barely half a percent desktop market share. Give me the cake and icing of OS X Leopard. Maybe it’s not a man’s manly and macho OS, but Leopard, like a Lexus, or Mercedes, or BMW is a better ride than the Tata Group’s People Car (the Nano).
By the way, Mac360 gives daily Mac updates on Twitter. If you Twitter, give Mac360 a tweet. One more thing. Only the best Mac software gets reviewed on Ron's NoodleMac site. Check it out.
Off Topic Note: The latest Mac software updates and a special RSS feed are available on the NoodleMac site (certified Mac software reviews). Are you ready for a new web site that’s all about Apple but mostly for professionals? AppleHits covers the Mac, iPhone, iPod, and everything else that’s a hit at Apple.
Guess what? Kate Mac is back on her own site after her year long flirtation with Microsoft Windows. One more thing: Ron has gone solo with his new McSolo site.
| Page 1 of 1 Page(s) for this article. |
Talk Back to the folks at Mac360
Mac360 readers talk back. View their comments below or post your own comment to this article. Comments are moderated by the Mac360 staff.
Or, post comments in the Mac360 Forums. It's mostly anonymous, there's no obligation, and no cost, so join in-- it's free, fun, low in calories, low in carbs, non-fat, and mildly addictive-- like chocolate and blondes.
What a dumb comment.
Macs are overpriced? Compared to what? Almost any major brand Windows PC with comparable hardware costs the same. No games? Every game that runs on Windows PCs will run on a Mac. How? Macs are the only major platform that also runs Windows and Linux flavors. $3,000 to join the ‘in crowd?’ How ridiculous. Macs start at $599. Most Macs sold are less than half the $3k price tag you toss around, you mindless sponge. Wake up. It’s the 21st century already. Macs. Rule. Again.
Apple is way over priced and there are no games for OSX. Thanks but no thanks. Unless you’re a video editor or something along those lines, there is no reason other than to be able to say “I have a mac”. I’m not ready to waste $3000 so I can join the “in crowd”
I have used both Linux and Windows Vista Ultimate and also Windows XP Pro. I’ve never used Mac OS X Leopard nor do I know anything about it. To me, Vista is way too slow. XP Pro is decent but I don’t think it even comes close to Mac OS X. Linux…well, Linux is Linux. It looks good but it may as well piss against the wind. I’ve been a PC user for many years but I’m ready to switch to a Mac. I saw an IMac with a 24” monitor and I wanted it immediately. Seeing how I’m a DAV (Vietnam) there is no way I can afford one. Maybe one of these days though.
You know you have a problem when:
The IT guy upgrading the office computers spends a long time assuring you that you will not be getting Vista, for which you and he are both glad.
I myself like both OS X and Windows Vista. Mostly because I like to work with the OS and how it looks and feels. I think many Linux user’s prefer basic function over a nice user interface. Its like some people like really nice cars and brag about horse power. Then you have people who just want a good running car even though it looks rather bland.
If you look at many of Linux critics and former users. Most would complain about two things. User interface and lack of compatibility. Two things that Mac OS X and Windows users want the most.
I think just in the last year or two has Linux developers realized that stability and security is not as important to basic users as they may have thought. After all Windows was known for being a big target for malware but still maintains a big user group. That says something for the user interface being important.
| Page 1 of 1 Page(s) for Comments on this article. |
| Copyright © 2004 - 2009 Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, Hawaii USA. All Rights Reserved.
Mac360 is published and edited by Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI. Powered by ExpressionEngine at Pair Networks. This page was rendered in 0.5768 seconds. |