Mac360 Easy Search
Enter your search keywords below »

Mac360 Power Search
Click below for advanced search options »

Latest Mac Reviews Mac360 Forums New Encore Reviews
Home  »  News & Commentary  »

Is Linux Really A Better OS Than Windows Or OS X?

MacLinuxIn an enlightened world is there such a thing as too much free speech? Take Linux founder Linus Torvalds. Please.

His latest point of view is that parts of Mac OS X are ‘utter crap.’ Guess what? He doesn’t like Windows Vista, either. Surprised?

I suppose we could toss aside Torvalds recent remarks as ‘his opinion’ and recognize that he’s the head of the Linux religion, which isn’t making much headway on the desktop against the heathen Windows and enlightened Mac OS X.

Having been a very long time Mac user, a Windows user, and a Linux user, along with various flavors of Unix here and there, I’m willing to defend Torvalds’ position against the entrenched opposition.

Without getting into the nuts and bolts of one kernel vs. another kernel, or Open Source vs. commercial, Torvalds, I would argue, is a non-pragmatic purist in an impure world where pragmatists live and prosper. That includes both Windows and Mac OS X, both of which have prospered mightily.

What of Linux? As a server operating system, Linux appears to do quite well in terms of market share, even mindshare, but simply doesn’t prosper in the rest of the computing world-- the desktop.

The varied Linux desktops and application suites as computing environments attached to the operating system, admittedly not Torvalds’s domain or responsibility, are pretty much a joke compared to the vast richness available on Windows and Mac OS X.

But Torvalds may be right from his perspective. After all, he said, ”I don’t think they’re equally flawed - I think Leopard is a much better system.”

Then he called Leopard’s file system ‘utter crap.’ Maybe so, maybe not. Let me not argue the fine points of file systems as they’re a dynamic anyway, and it appears that Apple is moving toward the highly touted ZFS file system, and besides, does it matter? To a purist who wants the world to see everything his way, perhaps. For the rest of us? Not so much.

Without really understanding exactly what he stumbled upon, Torvalds identified the real banana behind the skin. His view is that Linux is a real operating system, and Leopard and Vista are not. They’re environments. I agree. Here’s what he said:

An operating system should be completely invisible… To Microsoft and Apple (it is) a way to control the whole environment… to force people to upgrade their applications and hardware.”

At a very basic level, he’s probably correct. Windows Vista and Mac OS X are really computing ‘environments’ more than they are mere operating systems, as Torvalds purports Linux to be.

Only the very geekiest among computer users look forward to an upgrade of the Linux kernel, while Mac users by the millions throng to Apple’s synagogues to tithe and worship, purchase and upgrade.

Torvalds, the OS religious purist, will have none of that crass commercialism. We should thank God that Torvalds toils away on Linux and not on OS X. Microsoft and Apple actually have customers who pay money for products and service and have expectations that go beyond a free lunch, beyond a mere OS.

Torvalds’ success in the business world simply doesn’t match what cash-paying customers require. Glitz, glitter, shine, leather seats, climate controlled GUI, sometimes questionable functionality blended with infinite and sexy chic.

Yes, Linux may well be a better operating system than what is hidden in Windows Vista or Mac OS X, but it doesn’t matter. Linux is a very poor desktop solution, a weak computing environment to handle the personal computing requirements of the great unwashed masses of the developed world.

I say, let him have his purity, his hand crafted kernel updates, his anemic selection of Fisher-Price GUIs, and his barely half a percent desktop market share. Give me the cake and icing of OS X Leopard. Maybe it’s not a man’s manly and macho OS, but Leopard, like a Lexus, or Mercedes, or BMW is a better ride than the Tata Group’s People Car (the Nano).

Off Topic Note: I’ve updated the Mac360 Store with over 100 new categories-- More Macs, more iPods, more Mac books, more software. Click Here and select any category for more detail, or use the handy search function. Whenever you buy from Amazon through the Mac360 Store you help support Mac360. Click Here to save almost $10 on the new version of Photoshop Elements, and almost $20 on the latest version of Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac, available now from the Mac360 Store (it’s really Amazon). Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Entourage and more-- barely $50 more than Apple’s iWork ‘08. Save money and support Mac360 at the same time.

   • Article by Ron McElfresh • Published on Wednesday, February 6, 2008
   • Category: News & Commentary • 14 Reader comment(s) • Email This • Digg This • Shop Now
  Page 1 of 1 Page(s) for this article.

Talk Back to the folks at Mac360
Mac360 readers talk back. View their comments below or post your own comment to this article. Comments are moderated by the Mac360 staff. Or, post comments in the Mac360 Forums. It's mostly anonymous, there's no obligation, and no cost, so join in-- it's free, fun, low in calories, low in carbs, non-fat, and mildly addictive-- like chocolate and blondes.

Readers Talk Back:
Gatesbasher says:

OK: I’ve had a little longer to think about this, and I’ve seen that I was wrong about the point of this story. Torvalds’ comments about OS X are just noise: “Linux rules and Mac drools! Woof! Woof! Woof!”

The shocking revelation is that he’s living 20 years in the past. DOS was (or should have been) invisible; most of the time your only interaction with DOS was to type the name (or some stupid, impossible to remember abbreviation) of the application you wanted to launch, and it came up. What you saw on the screen was the responsibility of the app in question. If you didn’t like its functionality or “look and feel” you tried some other ones until you found one you liked.

Nowadays, with OS X and Windows all you see is the operating system. Applications work in the background to force your OS to perform a given function. If you don’t like the look and feel, you’ve got one (or counting Linux, two) alternatives. Failing that, you’re SOL. Not only are modern operating systems not “invisible,” arguably nothing else IS visible to the casual user.

Perhaps Mr. Torvalds’ antiquated idea of what an Operating System is like partially explains Linux’s small share of the desktop market. For IT professionals who like to get down and dirty with the nuts and bolts, it may be a real alternative, but for the rest of us, we want to turn on the computer and let OS X or Windows do that voodoo that they do do so well (or badly, as the case may be.)

   — Posted on Thu Feb 07 at 10:56 am by Gatesbasher

william says:

Linus is right about Linux being invisible.  I’ve never seen Linux on the desktop (of non-geeks.) OS X and Vista might not be “invisible” but that’s because users DON’T WANT THAT.

BTW: When you are doing an install or update, of those 3 operating systems, which are more invisible?  Linux certainly isn’t among them.

   — Posted on Thu Feb 07 at 9:55 am by william

WWWeary says:

The only way I can think to put this...every Operating System has its pros and cons.  In that regard, Mac OSX compares very favorably to the other choices out there.

   — Posted on Wed Feb 06 at 11:13 pm by WWWeary

Gatesbasher says:

I’m glad Linux exists. The Open Software Movement is a Good Thing,™ if only because anything that rattles Bill Gates’ cage as much as Linux does has made a real contribution to society already. That said, this reminds me of some of the oracular pronouncements of the great Computer Science honchos that they occasionally regale us with, just to complain about how we’ve messed up what they created.

Read any of the seminal papers from the 50’s and (early) 60’s: when talking about the software hierarchy, they completely missed the level of the Operating System (call it an “environment” if you will,) which is arguably all anyone deals with any more. This isn’t meant to criticize, it’s just meant to show that not everybody’s crystal ball is 100% reliable.

The only reasonable statement I ever read from any of these gurus was from Edsger Dijkstra (or was it Niklaus Wirth?): “No one can be taught proper programming practice whose brain has been destroyed by exposure to BASIC.” I guess he’s right; I’m always going: “Where are the freaking line numbers?”

   — Posted on Wed Feb 06 at 10:42 pm by Gatesbasher

Mike says:

Linux is just a Unix rip-off. Linus might be a smart guy but he is not a genius like Dennis Ritchie and Kenneth Thompson whom I worked for as a mail clerk.

   — Posted on Wed Feb 06 at 4:21 pm by Mike

Mario Cajina says:

What the reporters who initially reported this story failed to ask Mr. Torvalds is “Why do you think that?” or, “Can you elaborate?” All we get is that he said OS X’s file system is “crap.” Why? How so? What makes you say that? No one asked. Apparently, everyone forgot to ask just so they could get a juicy headline and lots of hits on their websites. Bad reporting. If someone says something that provocative, the reporters should have asked to elaborate. The next comment about MS and Apple making a big deal about an OS release is a non-sequitur. It doesn’t explain his initial comment.

Mr. Torvalds and the rest of the Linux developers should concentrate on Linux’s strengths as a server OS that doesn’t need to be seen or heard and leave the front end clients to companies that actually give a damn about the user experience. None of the Linux GUI’s are original and groundbreaking. They’re just rehashes of ideas by MS and Apple. When they learn to rally around ONE unified GUI for all Linux distros, then maybe the rest of the world will care.

   — Posted on Wed Feb 06 at 3:50 pm by Mario Cajina

  Page 2 of 3 Page(s) for Comments on this article.  <  1 2 3 >
     Back To Top

Talk Back to Mac360 and post your own comment

Your comment may be anonymous if you want (it's OK to use a cute name, or something everyone can remember). An email address is only required if you want to be notified of new comments by other posters, and is always shielded from email spam harvesters.

We moderate the comments, so keep it on topic, relevant, worthy, and funny. Or, pick any two. Yes, SPAM links will be deleted, so don't even think about it.

Talk back and enter your comment below:
Your Name:
Your Email:(optional: needed only for comment notification)
Your Location:(optional: your city, state, country)

Enter Your Comment Below:
Remember my personal information?
Notify me of follow-up comments by email?

Please enter the Mac360 "Magic Word" from the image below:



     Back To Top
What's in the FORUMS?
Newest Daily Topics



Also in Mac360
Recent Articles