|
Mac360 Power Search
Click below for advanced search options »
Mac360 Archives
By Month, All, Category
|
Leopard Makes It Official. Say Bye To Mac OS Classic.
Meanwhile, with little or no fanfare, Apple quietly put to rest the Mac we all knew and loved. Well, some of us. Mac OS Classic is dead. Long live the Mac. Apple watchers and Mac users have known this day would come, but it still seemed like a surprise, what with no announcement, or ceremony, or celebration. Mac OS X Classic, the remnants of the Mac OS that started it all back in 1984, is dead. At least, Mac Classic is dead on PowerPC Macs running OS X Leopard. Mac Classic actually ran in Tiger, but only on PowerPC Macs, not on Intel Macs. The Classic Mac era is over following the longest of long transitions dating back to 2001 when Mac OS X launched, fully capable of running Mac Classic. Starting with Mac OS Classic version 8.x, the Mac’s OS looked decent, and performed better than any version in the past. The platinum GUI look continued into Mac OS Classic version 9.x, the last to run side-by-side with Mac OS X. The early versions of Mac OS X were slower than Mac Classic, but by the time Jaguar made an entrance and Microsoft Mac Office and Adobe’s Photoshop suites were ready to run on OS X, Classic was lost to many Mac users. I know a lot of Mac users, and there are still holdouts, faithfully booting up in one version or another of Mac OS Classic. Some corporate IT staffs keep old Macs lying around with Classic just for compatibility with various files or applications. Personally, I have not used Mac Classic since OS X Panther, never in Tiger, and now, with OS X Leopard, no one gets to run the creaky old Classic on a new Mac or a new Mac OS.
It’s the changing of the guard, even though the new guard has been running things for years. The old guard is retiring. Now, that whole, quiet scenario brings up an interesting question about transitions, legacy systems, and the like. For example, OS X Leopard will not run on some PowerPC G4 models, requiring a minimum CPU of 867mhz. Some Macs up to six years old are OK, but a bunch of iBooks and iMacs with slow CPUs won’t make it to OS X Leopard. What? You’re a Mac user and you have not purchased a new Intel Mac yet? What about that old PowerPC Mac you’re running now? Odds are that the next version of Mac OS X, whatever it’s named, Mac OS X Hello Kitty, or whatever, will not run on most PowerPC Macs. Apple is herding the herd along into new hardware and software. That means that unless you’re running a PowerMac G5 today, whatever shows up after Leopard may not run on your creaky old PowerPC Mac. Got a problem with that? Sure. Talk Back to Mac360 and share your outrage (or, your inevitable sadness and remorse) about all these changes taking place in the world of personal computing, and do so in the Comments section below. • Article by Jeffrey Mincey • Published on Thursday, October 25, 2007
• Category: News & Commentary • 15 Reader comment(s) • Email This • Digg This • Shop Now
« Previously Uh Oh. Apple's First Big Goof Up With OS X Leopard.
Nextly » Are You Ready To Upgrade Your Mac To Leopard?
Talk Back to Kate, Ron & the Mac360 staff DanMan says:
I just did some more looking and all I could find was that Carbon might not support 64 bit yet, I guess I must’ve read something that was incorrect. — Posted on Thu Oct 25 at 3:09 pm by DanMan
DanMan says:
Never mind Classic… I think the big news is that Carbon-based apps won’t work anymore. I might be wrong, but I read that somewhere. Does anyone know for sure? — Posted on Thu Oct 25 at 2:56 pm by DanMan
Jeremy says:
What to do about all those GlobalFaxes that seem untranslatable? — Posted on Thu Oct 25 at 2:55 pm by Jeremy
Jan the Hedonist says:
Our company has over 100 Macs scattered here and there, and a bunch of them are old Macs running OS 9. We have specialized applications which require the so-called Mac Classic. Since we started buying Intel machines last year, there are fewer and fewer Macs here that can even run OS 9. New Mac users probably don’t care because all they know is Mac OSX anyway, but some of us put in a lot of years running the old Macs. — Posted on Thu Oct 25 at 2:51 pm by Jan the Hedonist
Weili says:
Why is anyone surprised at all that Leopard won’t support Classic? Actually, why is this even big of a deal enough to be a topic? It’s been almost 7 years since OS X has been released and I’ll be fair and count only 10.2 as the first truly useable OS X not only in terms of OS features but also the number of OS X compatible software. Considering that, OS X has been useable for almost 6 years. That’s a LONG time in computer terms. Now assuming for whatever reason, you still need Classic, you can still get a pretty fast machine that would run it. I mean, can you imagine running Classic on a Power Mac G5!? “Meanwhile, with little or no fanfare, Apple quietly put to rest the Mac we all knew and loved. Well, some of us. Mac OS Classic is dead. Long live the Mac.” Actually Steve Jobs and Apple declared OS 9 dead back in WWDC 2002, 5 years ago: — Posted on Thu Oct 25 at 2:45 pm by Weili
Gatesbasher says:
Well, it’s too bad; there are still a lot of great freeware apps out there that run on Classic. I have an old g3 iMac running Panther that I could have installed OS 9.2.2 on and run it under the Classic environment, but you know what? I couldn’t be bothered. When I saw that the Mac was now running a “Unix-based” OS (now Unix for real!), that’s what it took to draw me in: A real operating system instead of the congeries of progressively more incompetent hacks that Microsoft was putting out. Sure, Mac OS was much better, that’s a given, but it was time to move on. They’ve been very generous in giving Classic an extra five years of life (if you count to when the Intel Macs came out) but in addition to incompetence and stupidity, a lot of Microsoft’s problems can be attributed to their struggle to achieve backward compatibility for the DOS diehards. OS X really is much faster and more efficient; it may not seem that way because of the much more complex apps that we have nowadays, but can you imagine how slow they’d be under OS 9? So farewell, Mac OS, you revolutionized the industry, you had a 22-year run, people can still use you as long as they want on machines that will run everything but the new OS that comes out tomorrow; Rest in Peace! — Posted on Thu Oct 25 at 2:44 pm by Gatesbasher
Kacy says:
If you’re still using OS9, you also probably still wear an 80’s style mullet and love your acid wash jeans and everyone knows the exact year you stopped caring. — Posted on Thu Oct 25 at 1:56 pm by Kacy
∧ Back To Top |
What's in the FORUMS?
Newest Daily Topics
Also in Mac360
Recent Articles
|
| Copyright © 2004 - 2008 PanGeo Media, Honolulu, Hawaii USA. All Rights Reserved.
Mac360 is published and edited by Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI USA. Mac360 is served on an Apple Xserve using Mac OS X Tiger Server. Powered by ExpressionEngine at ServerLogistics. |