|
Mac360 Power Search
Click below for advanced search options »
Mac360 Archives
By Month, All, Category
|
Home » Daily Topics »
Pro vs. Joe: Why Apple Dumbed Down iMovie ‘08.
The most glaring issue is that Apple is purposely keeping the iLife applications dumbed down so they can upgrade users to the Pro apps. So, you say, ”That’s a heady statement, Kate. What do you have to back it up?” Take iMovie ‘08. Please. I’m one of those who liked using the old iMovie HD ‘06 version. iMovie is not Final Cut Express or Final Cut Pro, but it was a very decent video editor with plenty of capability built-in-- enough so that I didn’t bother to spend money on Apple’s pro video package. iMove HD had all the basics. Video timeline. Audio timeline. Clip bin. Easy import. Easy export. What iMove HD lacked was a way to manage video clips and projects, and an easy way to sort through clips for scenes. The new iMovie ‘08 takes care of that shortcoming with exactly what the old version lacked. Managing clips and movies and projects is easier in iMovie ‘08. But that’s it for me. The problem is that the rest of iMovie ‘08 is aimed at video neophytes; those who wouldn’t know a video and audio timeline from the various and sundry versions of Windows Vista (you need a scorecard or program for that effort). During the presentation of the new iLife, Steve Jobs mentioned that one of their software engineers couldn’t put together a video of a recent vacation, so he decided to create a new iMovie that would make video creation faster, easier, etc. Blah, blah, blah, and more PR speak.
How hard was it to put together a movie in the old iMovie? The guy must be living waaaaay too deep in ones and zeros if he couldn’t figure out iMovie HD ‘06 and create a movie in minutes. Import video, select clips, drag clips to timeline, add transitions and text and effects to clips. Export. Damn. That was hard, huh? And it was done on an easy to figure out timeline metaphor. The new iMovie ‘08 is missing that level of simplicity and replaced it with even more simplicity-- making the end result more difficult for former users of iMovie. I’m not sure that new users to iMovie will find the ‘08 version any easier. Gone is the iMovie timeline. Gone is handy transport control access. New are all kinds of buttons that only newbies will love. Apple has dumbed down iMovie ‘08. Why did Apple do this? It was not to create a video editing tool that could create a movie in minutes. iMovie HD could do that. Apple is focusing on the masses and that means keeping it simple. Dumbed down simple. You see the same approach in iPhoto and iWeb, especially the latter, which, while looking great just try building a web site using it. You’ll love the look, then get tired of the limitations. GarageBand is a bit different since audio quality will be the same whether using SoundTrack Pro, Logic, or GarageBand. Only the capabilities are dumbed down in GarageBand. iMovie is the worst offender because the previous version was a joy to use. Apple blatantly segregates applications by Pro user vs. Average Joe (or, Jolene) user. For those of us who find the “free” applications somewhat limiting and perhaps a bit sophomoric, Apple has Pro apps waiting around-- for a price. Don’t like the limitations in iPhoto? Go with Aperture for a mere $300. Don’t like the limitations in iMovie? Go with FinalCut Express HD for a mere $300. See how that works? It’s almost as if Apple has become the techno gadget drug dealer with free samples of media coolness. Once you’re hooked, the price goes up. Check out the daily list of our 9 Word mini-Reviews at NoodleMac, and Kate's daily in-depth Mac software reviews at PixoBebo. Off Topic #23 & #18 - Want to speed up your Mac? Try Kate MacKenzie’s approach to the $7.99 speed increase. Do you have a back up system for your Mac? Kate’s PixoBebo shows you how to use Time Machine with SuperDuper! for the ultimate Mac back up. And she doesn’t even charge Mac360 readers to visit her site. Off Topic #58 - Do politicians use personal computers? Of course. We’ve heard Barack Obama prefers a Mac, while Hillary Clinton uses a Dell, though, apparently neither of the candidates can bowl. Does Obama’s potential vice president use a Mac? Even Clinton acknowledges Apple’s brand power but says she can’t afford a Mac. Maybe she’d win if she used a Mac.
• Article by Kate MacKenzie • Published on Thursday, August 9, 2007
• Category: Daily Topics • 20 Reader comment(s) • Email This • Digg This • Shop Now
« Previously A Critical Look At What You Can And Can't Do In iWeb.
Nextly » It's Time To Stop All The Noise About Macs And iLife '08.
Talk Back to Kate, Ron & the Mac360 staff iMoviefan says:
Sorry guys… Not buying it. Bottom line, Kate nailed it. The issue is FUNCTIONALITY. I get that Apple was trying to put out a version of iMovie that a hamster could use, and a retarded hamster at that. Fair enough. But COME ON! Look at all the functions that were left off. This is NOT about “comfort zones” and “hissy fits.” I can deal with new interfaces and the like. No problem. But this? It’s like I’ve been driving a car for years, and suddenly someone is trying to sell me a bicycle as an upgrade. True, it is simpler to use, and more widely accessible to the general public, but… well you get the idea. The bottom line: An upgrade should be an UPGRADE. iMovie 08 is NOT. — Posted on Mon May 05 at 5:53 pm by iMoviefan
jd says:
I’m mad as hell...in my opinion it seems like steve jobs was not on the ‘Job’ or maybe bill gates sliped something in his ‘Apple’ juice !! ..what were they thinking-- !!!? I been running the ‘real’ imovie ware for years..As for 08 being easier? I had to pay for an online tutorial to understand that mishmashed imovie o8 interface!!..Imovie 08 is a slouch!!!-missing tons of very urgent and important tools ... those who say ‘nay..? ,,you must be a newbie and never used the old versions
— Posted on Sat Feb 23 at 10:03 pm by jd
David says:
Peter nailed the direction apple is going.
— Posted on Sat Aug 11 at 10:47 am by David
Peter says:
iMovie was the only app I never really used. I played with version 1 when it first came out and made a few movies, but it was always too time consuming. It was a cumbersome app and it did not get easier with newer versions. We must distinguish between easy-to-use and easy-to-learn. Perhaps old iMovie was easy to use once you had learned it but I never got there, and I cannot even dream of seeing my parents using it. iMovie 08 looks great and I cannot wait to play with it. — Posted on Fri Aug 10 at 8:08 am by Peter
quentin says:
So, New Type, what you’re saying is that Apple dumbed down the new iMovie, right? After two days of dealing with the inefficiency of creating a movie the “new” way I can say Apple missed the boat with this one. Instead of making iMovie easier to use, and add library clip and project features, they start from scratch, create a new paradigm for editing without realizing that it’s actually worse than the old way. We love you Kate!! Keep up the good work and keep callin’ ‘em like they is.
— Posted on Fri Aug 10 at 2:38 am by quentin
NewType says:
I have to definitely agree with Ron and IT Guy. The problem Katie, is that you don’t like iMovie ‘08 because it isn’t a gussied up iMovie HD. In other words, it’s something different and pokes at more than a few comfort zones. I would like to remind everyone here that there was ceaseless complaining about the “inefficiences” and the “worthless eye candy” of the Dock when OS X first debuted from hordes of comfortable MacOS 9 users. In fact, as I recall, many MacOS 9 users were disatisfied wtih nearly all aspects of OS X. My point? It wasn’t that OS X was inferior to OS 9 - it was clearly a superior foundation and a platform that would enable Apple to grow to to where it is today. But the main beef, it seems to me, was that OS X was simply too different and broke too many conventions. I would also like to remind the general distaste many people had for iTunes when it first debuted. iTunes was considered a “bad” program because it managed all the music for you. You had no idea where it cataloged the actual music files on your hard drive. It was “horrible” that it took away the control away from the user, who was quite comfortable filing away music in hundreds of manually created folders and sub-folders because that user was *used to* knowing exactly how to spend hours and hours filing music away. Only after a couple of years did people realize, “Duh! There’s no point in manually managing music! The computer should just do it for me!” iMovie ‘08 is similar in such a way in that it attacks the very assumptions of what a futuristic non-linear video editor should be. It breaks the old, comfortable assumptions. Your article is a little bit disingenuous in that (as others pointed out above) the engineer behind iMovie ‘08 in question was a Final Cut Pro master, yet it almost sounds like you are talking down to him about how to edit movies. iMovie ‘08 is a RETHINKING of basic video editing. That’s why it has a totally new icon, to visually indicate a TOTAL break from the past. Frankly, Apple should have also changed the name because iMovie ‘08 leads people to mistakenly think it is an upgrade from iMovie HD. It is NOT. It is something totally new, and is version 1.0 of something totally new. So instead of trying to force iMovie ‘08 to be like iMovie HD, why not take a step back and reevaluate things in a new light. Because if Apple simply decided to make iMovie ‘08 into Final Cut Express Light, well, someone please explain to me how making a video editing program more and more like a Pro app with each iteration makes things easier for the video neophyte? Because that’s what was happening (and I’ve even heard some people say Apple should just make FCE the new iMovie - please! Talk about not knowing your audience!) Funny how some Mac users are so proud to “think different” but when it comes down to it, Apple is really the only one that’s willing to take that risk time after time. — Posted on Fri Aug 10 at 2:02 am by NewType
IT Guy says:
I think you’re reading something far more sinister into this than what is really going on:
Sometimes it truly is better to start over from scratch, but with software, there’s always a price and it’s usually feature immaturity. I’m looking forward to kicking the tires on iMovie 08. It’ll be interesting to see whether it gets any significant feature upgrades before the next rev of iLife ships. I’m betting yes. — Posted on Thu Aug 09 at 11:04 pm by IT Guy
Kenneth Charles says:
Kate, that’s a bit of rant, but it looks to me like you isolated the exact issue with iMovie 8. I listened to Jobs’ presentation and wondered what kind of Apple engineer who apparently knew something about Final Cut yet couldn’t use iMovie to edit clips of a movie in 20 minutes. My wife can do it, so the fault isn’t with iMovie. I have to agree that Apple is pulling a switcheroo on us. iMovie gets the library and project features but loses the all important timeline for editing. Dumb, dumb, dumber. There’s nothing in iMovie 8 that could not have been popped into the old iMovie and improved what was already very good. I tried iMovie 8 and found that there’s no time savings, no keystroke savings, not anything better at all except for the project and clip management. You are 100% correct, despite what the idiot above me wrote-- iMovie 8 is dumbed down and aimed at a very basic user-- probably the Windows PC users who are switching to the Mac. — Posted on Thu Aug 09 at 10:33 pm by Kenneth Charles
∧ Back To Top |
What's in the FORUMS?
Newest Daily Topics
Also in Mac360
Recent Articles
|
|
Copyright © 2004 - 2008 PanGeo Media, Honolulu, Hawaii USA. All Rights Reserved.
Mac360 is published and edited by Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI USA. Mac360 is served on an Apple Xserve using Mac OS X Tiger Server. Powered by ExpressionEngine at ServerLogistics. Page rendered in 2.0141 seconds. |