
It’s official. The Mac has viruses, malware, exploits, vulnerabilities, and probably acne. Seriously.
The experts agree. Mac and Windows are both vulnerable to attack. Safeguard your data. Buy something from Symantec.
These headlines pop up every couple of months from a few industry security experts. Except for that last sentence, which is implied, or buried in the story about the latest vulnerability and exploit.
“The Mac is just as vulnerable as Windows,” they say. The “they” come from two camps. One is the camp that wants to sell you software to protect your Mac (or Windows PC), and the other camp usually is a disgruntled security expert, or a hack(er) looking for hits to a blog.
Each camp receives free promotion of their perspective from online tech magazine writers, notorious for their inability to know fact from fiction, up from down, or Windows PCs from Macs.
Here’s the latest headline from James Rivington of Tech magazine. It’s very simple, somewhat alarming, and just plain wrong.
That’s what most readers will remember. Few will remember the subheadline, “Symantec man says small user base is reason for secure rep.”
By that logic, and it sounds plausible, the only reason the Mac doesn’t have viruses, malware, exploits in the wild (the kind you can catch, like a cold), is because the Mac market share is soooooo small, and no decent virus writer cares about creating an exploit for the Mac.
The fantasizing by the so-called journalist doing the reporting for Tech continues with another classic statement, the first in the article:
See? That’s scary. It’s also wrong. Dead wrong. The proof for being correct doesn’t exist. The proof for being incorrect does exist—as in, no viruses or malware on the planet for Macs. Hundreds of thousands of such for Windows PCs.
Again, attribution for the ludicrous premise goes to Symantec’s software architect, Ollie Whitehouse. Sigh. I want to cry. For a week or two after such headlines all my nearly extinct Windows PC buddies cry, “See. Macs have viruses, too.”
Except they don’t. Even some Mac users lament the inevitable as fact, not fiction.
Mac and Windows take different approaches to security. Windows versions prior to Vista were riddled with holes, vulnerabilities, exploits, easily taken advantage of by the unscrupulous in computerdom. Mac OS X’s built in security and permissions set up makes it very difficult for a virus writer to do what is common and comicly easy to do on a Windows PC.
That fact is seldom mentioned by the headline writers or by Symantec or anyone else trying to make a buck off Mac users by using scare tactics.
At a base level, all major operating systems, Mac OS X, Windows (whatever flavor), Linux, (whatever flavor), and the Unix crowd, have vulnerabilities which can be exploited. Therefore, at that level, all operating systems, even Mac and Windows are the same.
The difference is how difficult it is to exploit a vulnerability, how many exploits exist for the various operating systems, how many are in the wild causing destruction or mayhem.
See the difference? Windows has plenty of wild exploits of varying kinds. The Mac has zero. Why? Again, it has to do with architecture and permissions, not market share.
Why would a so-called expert from Symantec say that Macs are just as vulnerable to viruses as Windows when they clearly are not? Symantec sells software to help secure your Mac or PC. Except Mac users don’t need it, and Windows users are leaving Windows PCs in droves to the more secure, more dependable, more usable world of Mac OS X.
The “experts” are crying Wolf! When a true, in-the-wild vulnerability surfaces that can infect millions or even hundreds of thousands or even thousands of Macs, you’ll hear about it. The cry will be much louder than rinky dinky non-thinkyTech magazine trolling for hits; much louder than a Symantec security guru saying “I told you so.”
When it happens, you’ll hear about it loud and clear. Then, check the date and time, and mark the hours before a fix is provided, then compare that response to Microsoft’s response to fixing Windows exploits. Response? Sure. Microsoft decided to sell virus and malware protection rather than fix their software.
Why do Macs have viruses and malware just like Windows PCs? Because those telling you they do have a vested interest in crying Wolf!—more money for them, less money for you.
Click Here to see reader comments on this article in the Mac360 Forums.
By Ron McElfresh | My first Mac was the 128k model (from 1984, so I'm old). I live and work in Honolulu, Hawaii. Read my daily commentary on McSolo, check for certified Mac software updates on NoodleMac, and follow me on Twitter.
• Email This Article
• Follow Mac360 on Twitter
• Posted in the Forum Topics Section
• Mac Buyer Poll: What Will Be Your Next New Mac.
• The New MacBook: Mac OS X, iPhone OS X, Or Both?
• Can You Have A Lightweight Back Up On A Mac?
• How Big Is The Hard Disk Drive On Your MacBook?
Off Topic Note: Need more Mac software reviews? Check out Page 2 for encore articles. Help support Mac360. Order your copy of Mac OS X Snow Leopard from Mac360 through Amazon. Snow Leopard is $29 for the Single User Upgrade, and only $49 for the 5 User Family Pack Upgrade.
Mac360 posts daily Mac updates on Twitter, too. If you Twitter, give Alexis, Bambi, or Ron a tweet and follow Mac360 on Twitter to get daily Mac tips and tricks.
Copyright © 2004 - 2009 Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI USA. All Rights Reserved.
Mac360 is published by Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI and powered by ExpressionEngine at Pair Networks.
Mac360 pages are best viewed in Safari 4.x or Firefox 3.x browsers. Microsoft Internet Explorer is not supported.
This Mac360 page was created in 0.5383 seconds.