Mac360 Easy Search
Enter your search keywords below »

Mac360 Power Search
Click below for advanced search options »
Latest Mac Reviews Mac360 Forums New Encore Reviews
Home  »  Reviews  »

Best of Mac: The Best Text Editors On The Planet.

TextText editors are not word processors so everyone doesn’t really have a need for one.

If you use a text editor then you know the good from the bad. Surprisingly, there’s more text editors for Mac OS X than word processors. What’s that say?

Text editors edit text. So does a word processor. What’s the difference?

It’s all in the text and how it gets into the document. While word processors have layers of features and can embed everything from spreadsheets, to tables, to pictures, to movies, to graphics, text editors don’t do much more than, well, text.

Even more than word processors, Mac users who need a text editor, have a text editor, or have a love-hate relationship with a number of text editors, have favorites.

Text editors are what programmers use to create the “clean” code that goes into a script or a program. Most text editors are considered bare bones word processors. Bare bones? Did I let that slip?

However, text editors don’t really process words as much as they facilitate quick handling of the arcane programming and scripting languages required to make today’s Mac applications work.

Generally speaking, text editors are bare bones in that they “specialize” in creating text (code) that’s clean and will work appropriately as a script, or compile appropriately as an application.

What’s surprising is the sheer number of text editors available for Mac OS X.

In fact, your Mac probably has a few already. One is TextEdit. It’s really more of a bare bones word processor, though. It’ll read Microsoft Word files. But it’s not a good editor for creating PHP scripts or web pages.

Also on your Mac are two Unix-flavored text editors; the venerable and difficult to master Vi, and the menu-driven Pico.

I use Pico. I don’t use Vi. So Pico is on my list. Vi is on the list of many developers and programmers, though. For newbies, it’s pronounced “vee eye.” Pico is pronounced “pee-coh.”

Point your browser to VersionTracker and enter “text editor.” There’ll be about four pages of response, not all of which are true text editors. However, there’s enough to narrow the group down to five.

My first true text editor was Pico. It’s a great little editor that handles most text editing requirements. Pico is built in to most Unix systems and it’s available on Mac OS X via the terminal. Working text in Pico is not at all unlike working with WordStar on DOS machines back in the early 80s. There’s control keys, and a menu at the bottom.

Not much else.

As far as other text editors go, see if you can find one you know in the list below:

• TextForge (Cocoa-based editor)
• iText X (some word processing)
• iTexMac (TeTex front end, TeX editor)
• Tex-Edit Plus (scriptable editor)
• LightwayText (multi-lingual word processor)
• SubEthaEdit (Rendezvous, collaborative editor)
• JeditX (basic editor)
• TextWrangler (a junior editor from BareBones—free)
• Ulysses (special editor for writers)
• Emacs (GNU emacs editor)
• Emacs/Carbon (Aqua build of Emacs)
• Alphatk (for Java, TeX, HTML, C, Perl, Python)
• BBEdit (the master from Bare Bones)

There’s many more. I’ve tried and used most of those above. For most specific purposes, they’ll do the job. A text editor is a “personal thing.” The right editor makes the job easier, better, more accurate, more efficient. The wrong editor just causes grief at every stage.

That’s why there’s so many text editors. We’ll live with a word processor that’s common to everyone. If you sling code for a living, the editor has to “fit”.

Here’s my Top 5 Best And 3 Worst Text Editors (in order)

#1 - BBEdit from Bare Bones Software. A good reason to buy a Mac.
#2 - TexEdit Plus from Tom Bender. It does a little of everything quite well.
#3 - Pico (built in to Mac OS X) It’s everywhere you want to be.
#4 - TextForge (editing in Cocoa)
#5 - SubEthaEdit (way cool capabilities for group editing)

Why BBEdit? Ask anyone who uses it. It’s sweet.

The Worst Text Editors

#1 - Microsoft Word. No matter what, it can’t do clean text. Not possible, right?
#2 - Apple’s TextEdit. Is it SimpleText? Is it a word processor? Make up your mind.
#3 - Vi. Hats off to those who use Vi. It can’t get more difficult.

Honorable Mention Text Utilities

#1 - textSOAP. It just does so much to clean up text (more of a utility)
#2 - Text-Osterone. Gutsy name (creates Flash text effects)
#3 - Clean Text 3.4.1 (like textSOAP)
#4 - Tofu (arranges text in columns; on-screen text reader)
#5 - TextSpresso (text filtering and cleaning processor)

As always, your mileage may vary. Text processors are more personal than word processors, right? Did I leave yours off the list? Let me know what it is. What? You LOVE Vi? That can’t be, can it?

What’s your opinion? Share it with others. Click Here for Feedback, or click the Comments link below to share your thoughts and perspective with other readers.

The above is an updated Encore Presentation of a previous article. We’re celebrating today. Tera’s back.

By the way, Mac360 gives daily Mac updates on Twitter. If you Twitter, give Mac360 a tweet. One more thing. Only the best Mac software gets reviewed on Ron's NoodleMac site. Check it out.

Off Topic Note: The latest Mac software updates and a special RSS feed are available on the NoodleMac site (certified Mac software reviews). Are you ready for a new web site that’s all about Apple but mostly for professionals? AppleHits covers the Mac, iPhone, iPod, and everything else that’s a hit at Apple.

Guess what? Kate Mac is back on her own site after her year long flirtation with Microsoft Windows. One more thing: Ron has gone solo with his new McSolo site.

    By Jack D. Miller  |  Published on Friday, October 21, 2005
    Category: Reviews  |   3 Reader comment(s)   |  Email This  |  Shop Now
    Follow Mac360 on Twitter
  Page 1 of 1 Page(s) for this article.

Talk Back to the folks at Mac360
Mac360 readers talk back. View their comments below or post your own comment to this article. Comments are moderated by the Mac360 staff. Or, post comments in the Mac360 Forums. It's mostly anonymous, there's no obligation, and no cost, so join in-- it's free, fun, low in calories, low in carbs, non-fat, and mildly addictive-- like chocolate and blondes.

Readers Talk Back:
Chris says:

Yes, VI is awesome actually… once you get over the steep learning cliff, and figure out how to use it.

It’s because you can do so much without moving your fingers from the home keys… and because it’s on so many development platforms out of the box.

   — Posted by Chris

gp says:

VI IS IN THE TOP WORST???! 

Wow. 

While I will concede that Vi has a very steep learning curve, it is by far, not a bad text editor.  And, if you’re going to beat on Vi, how come you don’t mention emacs? 

I’ve been through this time and again with people at work.  I watch then struggle with Vi (Vim, really), then curse a little, ultimately falling back to something simplistic like nano, or just plain old text editors like textedit, gedit, or notepad.  But, they soon try Vi again, and again, and again…finally, they actually use the vimtutor program on the command line.  They actually take the 10-20 minutes it takes to get past the fact they actually have to be engaged enough to read something, learn the steps it takes to navigate the program, and viola.  A new die-hard Vi user is born.  Then months go by, and they invariably look back and say, “...wow, I wish all text editors were as powerful and easy to use as Vi!!!”

You should give it a shot - no really!  Actually learn to use something before getting frustrated with it, kicking your feet, and screaming at it before publicly degrading it in front of millions of internet goers.  Isn’t being fair and objective what an adult should do when evaluating things in life? 

Let’s stop teaching our children that everything they do should be easy, and that learning something new (or really, actually taking the time to do so and not being part of the lazy, instant gratification generations we are breeding these days) doesn’t always come with little to no effort. 

Learning Vi (and I’m sure emacs, too) is WELL worth the rewards in the end, once the learning curve is scaled…

For windows and linux, you can always get a free copy of gvim if you need a gui…and those wonderful people from google have provided a native mac port called macvim. 

http://code.google.com/p/macvim/

GP

   — Posted by gp

Barry says:

I just downloaded Smultron and I’m so glad that I did. I’ve been looking for an editor similar to Notepad++ (my PC HTML editing program) and this is fantastic.

   — Posted by Barry

  Page 1 of 1 Page(s) for Comments on this article.
     Back To Top

Talk Back to Mac360 and post your own comment

Your comment may be anonymous if you want (it's OK to use a cute name, or something everyone can remember). An email address is only required if you want to be notified of new comments by other posters, and is always shielded from email spam harvesters.

We moderate the comments, so keep it on topic, relevant, worthy, and funny. Or, pick any two. Yes, SPAM links will be deleted, so don't even think about it.

Talk back and enter your comment below:
Your Name:
Your Email:(optional: needed only for comment notification)
Your Location:(optional: your city, state, country)

Enter Your Comment Below:
Remember my personal information?
Notify me of follow-up comments by email?

Please enter the Mac360 "Magic Word" from the image below:


  

     Back To Top
What's in the FORUMS?
Newest Daily Topics



Also in Mac360
Recent Articles