
Kate and I are on a mission to rebuild a web site and neither of us claim any particular design and coding skills.
What we need are the right web site construction tools, some experience, a few objectives, and a little participation from Mac360 readers.
Our objective for the site is rather straightforward. Update, freshen, improve, and expand Mac360 and bring it from 2004 to 2009. For example, in 2004, a site that was 760 pixels wide was all the rage, very common.
.... (excerpted).jwdsail said:
Here’s my issue w/ CSS…
To me sites migrating to CSS suffer from one of two issues.
1. They all start to look like the same WoodPress blog…
2. The ones that don’t .. seem to look… too good.. so that the look distracts from the actual content, distractions, navigational “mystery meat”, etc ...
Not saying that mac360 will fall into either trap, just something I’ve seen become an issue lately…
Good luck, can’t wait to see what comes next.
jwd
Post your own comment to this article. Or, post in the Mac360 Forums. It's mostly anonymous, there's no obligation, and no cost. Posting is free, fun, low in calories, low in carbs, non-fat, and mildly addictive. It's like chocolate and blondes.
Your comment may be anonymous, if you prefer. Or, use a cute name-- something everyone can remember. An email address is required only if you want to be notified of new comments by other posters, and is always shielded from email spam harvesters (but don't use a Gmail or Yahoo! or Hotmail or any free email service address-- too much spam).
Keep your comment on topic, relevant, worthy, and funny. Or, pick any three. We moderate the comments so SPAM links will be deleted (Spammers-- you're a blight so don't waste your time or ours).
Copyright © 2004 - 2009 Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI USA. All Rights Reserved.
Mac360 is published by Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI and powered by ExpressionEngine at Pair Networks.
Mac360 pages are best viewed in Safari 4.x or Firefox 3.x browsers. Microsoft Internet Explorer is not supported.
This Mac360 page was created in 0.5070 seconds.
jwdsail said:
*WordPress
sigh