
It’s no secret that the iPod is made by a Taiwan company for Apple. Supplies of Apple’s iPod shuffle have been in short supply since the launch in early January.
It’s possible there’s a shortage because Taiwan is manufacturing iPod shuffle “clones” and selling them in Aisa and Europe, not in the United States.
LuxPro’s Super shuffle was announced and on display at the CeBIT Conference in Germany.
The shuffle clone looks exactly like Apple’s diminutive iPod shuffle,.... (excerpted).
Post your own comment to this article. Or, post in the Mac360 Forums. It's mostly anonymous, there's no obligation, and no cost. Posting is free, fun, low in calories, low in carbs, non-fat, and mildly addictive. It's like chocolate and blondes.
Your comment may be anonymous, if you prefer. Or, use a cute name-- something everyone can remember. An email address is required only if you want to be notified of new comments by other posters, and is always shielded from email spam harvesters (but don't use a Gmail or Yahoo! or Hotmail or any free email service address-- too much spam).
Keep your comment on topic, relevant, worthy, and funny. Or, pick any three. We moderate the comments so SPAM links will be deleted (Spammers-- you're a blight so don't waste your time or ours).
Copyright © 2004 - 2009 Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI USA. All Rights Reserved.
Mac360 is published by Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI and powered by ExpressionEngine at Pair Networks.
Mac360 pages are best viewed in Safari 4.x or Firefox 3.x browsers. Microsoft Internet Explorer is not supported.
This Mac360 page was created in 0.3723 seconds.
What they won't tell you said:
Some of the “clone” products that appear are actually companies in China that have been approached by known brand names as cheaper manufacturing bases (Lego is another example).
They get a chance to build something from the blue prints as a sample to show the brand name what they can do in the way of quality.
Some however don’t make the cut quality wise and so don’t get the build contracts. They do however have the right to keep the raw design and make similar products as long as they don’t use proprietary functions ie the iDock system. This is why these products look the same but can function differently.
This is also why there haven’t been any actions against people selling look alike brands even in retail outlets, unless they claimed to be the real thing.
Apple would surely not respond to what their outlook on the “cloning” is as they set it up in the first place.
Remember the term “IBM clone”?