
It’s no secret that the iPod is made by a Taiwan company for Apple. Supplies of Apple’s iPod shuffle have been in short supply since the launch in early January.
It’s possible there’s a shortage because Taiwan is manufacturing iPod shuffle “clones” and selling them in Aisa and Europe, not in the United States.
LuxPro’s Super shuffle was announced and on display at the CeBIT Conference in Germany.
The shuffle clone looks exactly like Apple’s diminutive iPod shuffle, right down to the round scroll wheel, color, size,.... (excerpted).
You may post your own comment on this article. Or, post in the Mac360 Forums. Either way, it's mostly anonymous, there's no obligation, and no cost. Posting comments is free, fun, low in calories, low in carbs, non-fat, mildly addictive, and may give you mild euphoria (due to the false sense of literary prowess).
Your comment may be anonymous, if you prefer. Or, use a cute name-- something everyone can remember. An email address is required only if you want to be notified of new comments by other posters, and is always shielded from email spam harvesters (but don't use a Gmail or Yahoo! or Hotmail or any free email service address-- too much spam).
Keep your comment on topic, relevant, worthy, and funny. Or, pick any three. We moderate the comments before posting so SPAM links will be deleted (Spammers-- you're a blight on society, not to mention your body odor, so don't waste your time or our time).
Please Note: Your comment will not show up immediately. We moderate all reader comments to eliminate spam, off topic posts, and silly arguments. Otherwise, don't worry, post your comment and enjoy. Your email address is never displayed.
Copyright © 2004 - 2010 Ron McElfresh, Honolulu, HI USA. All Rights Reserved.
Mac360 is best viewed in Safari 4.x or Firefox 3.x browsers. Microsoft Internet Explorer is not supported.
Mac360 is developed on a Mac and powered by an Apple Xserve at ServerLogistics.
This Mac360 page was created in 0.2117 seconds.
What they won't tell you said:
Some of the “clone” products that appear are actually companies in China that have been approached by known brand names as cheaper manufacturing bases (Lego is another example).
They get a chance to build something from the blue prints as a sample to show the brand name what they can do in the way of quality.
Some however don’t make the cut quality wise and so don’t get the build contracts. They do however have the right to keep the raw design and make similar products as long as they don’t use proprietary functions ie the iDock system. This is why these products look the same but can function differently.
This is also why there haven’t been any actions against people selling look alike brands even in retail outlets, unless they claimed to be the real thing.
Apple would surely not respond to what their outlook on the “cloning” is as they set it up in the first place.
Remember the term “IBM clone”?